Development of Physics Test Instruments to Measure Problem Solving Skills on Dynamic Fluid Materials

Aditya Putra Sanjaya; Yul Ifda Tanjung; Satria Mihardi

doi:10.24036/jipt/vol2-iss2/68

Authors

Aditya Putra Sanjaya Universitas Negeri Medan https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6133-0383
Yul Ifda Tanjung Universitas Negeri Medan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-5994
Satria Mihardi Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol2-iss2/68

Keywords:

Problem Solving, 4D Model, Dynamic Fluids

Abstract

Problem solving skills are a fundamental part of physics learning that must be possessed by students in facing challenges and problems that involve critical thinking, logical, systematic and able to make the right decisions. In fact, the availability of instruments to measure these skills is still limited. Based on that, the purpose of this research is to develop a test instrument based on problem solving skills based on Heller's stages on dynamic fluid material that meets the criteria for good instrument feasibility. This type of research is development research (Research and Development / R&D) with a 4D model consisting of 4 stages, namely define, design, develop and disseminate. The subjects of this study were XI grade high school students totaling 36 people for product testing. The results showed that the average value of content validity testing was 93.53% with very valid criteria, while the results of item validation in small and large groups showed that all ten test instruments were categorized as valid. In terms of reliability, the small group obtained a value of 0.84 which is classified as very high reliability and in the large group obtained a value of 0.78 which is classified as high reliability. The results of the student response test obtained a positive response in the small group of 81.00% with a good category and in the large group of 81.32% with a very good category. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that the dynamic fluid material problem solving test instrument developed as many as 10 questions has met the eligibility criteria of the test instrument including validity and reliability so that it can then be used as a training medium and a measuring tool for problem solving skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, Sa’dun. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ayuningtyas, C.D., Ayu, N., & Faisal, K. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Aktif dengan Metode The Power Of Two dan Make A Match terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sale. Proceeding Seminar Nasional

Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teacher College Record, 110(3), 608-645.

Desliana, Mira. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas X SMAN 4 Tanjungpinang Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Model David Kolb. Skripsi Pendidikan Biologi. Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji. Tanjung pinang

Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2009). Measuring complex problem solving: The MicroDYN approach.In F. Scheuermann & J. Björnsson (Eds.), The transition to computer-based assessment: New approaches to skills assessment and implications for large-scale testing (pp.157–163). Ispara, Italy: European Commission.

Hadisaputra, S., Ihsan, MS, Gunawan, & Ramdani, A. (2020). The development of chemistry learning devices is based on a blended learning model to promote students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521.

Hedge,B.,dan B.N. Meera. (2012). How Do They Solve It? An Insight into the Learner’s approach to the mechanism of problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 8 (1), 1-9.

Heller, Kenneth dan Heller, Patricia. (2010). Cooperative Problem Solving in Physics A User’s Manual. US : Department of Education.

Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2004). Spss explained: Routledge.

Hsu, L., Brewe, E., Foster, T. M., & Harper, K. A. (2004). Resource letter RPS-1: Research in problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 72(9), 1147-1156.

Kara , F., & Celikler, D. (2015). Development of Achievement Test: Validity and Reliability

Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32 (3), 131-137.

Marlina, D., Sari, S. Y., & Rahim, F. R. (2024). Development of Interactive Learning Media Using the Lectora Application to Enhance Student’s Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 2(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol2-iss1/32

Martinez, M. E. (1998). What Is Poblem Solving ?. The Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 605–609.

Mayasari, A., Wandika, W., & Fitri, A. D. (2023). Effect Size Analysis of the Problem based Learning Model on Students’ HOTS Ability and Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 1(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol1-iss1/2

Purwanto. (2017). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahmawati.,Nuryani, Y., Hamidah, I., dan Rusdiana, D. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah pada Materi Kelistrikan dan Kemagnetan. Conference, Seminar Kontribusi Fisika, 94-103.

Rahmi, M., Rahim, F. R., Sari, S. Y., & Murtiani, M. (2024). Development of a HOTS Indicator Availability Test Instrument for Instructional Media. Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 2(1), 78–88.

Rapih, S., & Sytardi. (2018). Perspektif Guru Sekolah Dasar Terhadap Higher Order Thinking Skills Pemahaman, Penerapan, dan Hambatan. Premier Education: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 8 (1), 78-87.

Rusdianto, Andy. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Pelajaran matematika kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. JP3D (Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar), 3(1), 2654-2870.

Sani, R. A. (2019). Cara Membuat Soal HOTS. Tangerang : Tira Smart

Sani, R. A. (2019). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Depok : Rajawali Pers.

Sudijono, Anas. (2008). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada .

Sudjana, Nana. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tanjung, Y. I., dan Bakar, A. (2019). Development of physical test instruments based on the conceptual knowledge dimension of the revision bloom taxonomy. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 141-148.

Tanjung, Y. I., dan Dwiana, Y.A. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Critical Thinking Skill Pada Materi Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(4), 83-86.

Tanjung, Y. I., dan Nasution, I.R. (2022). The Development of Creative Thinking Test Instruments with Torrance Indicators on Direct Current Electricity Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(2), 134-143.

Tanjung, Y. I., dan Rahma. M. A. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Pengetahuan Faktual Pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi di SMA. Jurnal Ikatan Alumni Fisika Universitas Negeri Medan, 8(1), 1-7.

Tanjung, Y. I., Wulandari, D., Bakar, A., Ramadhani, I. (2021). The Development of Online Physics Test System at SMA CT Foundation Medan. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1819, 1-8.

Widana, I Wayan. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Higher Order Thingking Skill (HOTS). Direktorat Pembinaan Sma Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan 2017.