The Effectiviness of The Generative Learning Model with Cognitive Conflict Strategy on Students’ Science Literacy in Fluid Material in Grade XI

Authors

  • Siti Rahma Fitri Yani Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Akmam Department of Physics, Padang State University, Padang, Indonesia
  • Yenni Darvina Department of Physics, Padang State University, Padang, Indonesia
  • Fuja Novitra Department of Physics, Padang State University, Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol3-iss2/105

Keywords:

Science Literacy, Generative Learning, Cognitive Conflict, Fluid

Abstract

Science literacy is an important skill in modern science education, involving understanding concepts, reasoning scientifically, and applying science in everyday situations. However, the level of science literacy among students in Indonesia is still low, as seen in the 2022 PISA results, which are below the global average. This shows the need for learning models that can increase cognitive participation and form a deep conceptual understanding. Generative learning models, which focus on knowledge construction through the integration of prior knowledge with new learning experiences, are considered suitable for improving science literacy, especially when combined with cognitive conflict strategies. This study aims to examine the impact of a generative learning model that uses cognitive conflict strategies on students' science literacy on the topic of Fluids in Grade XI Phase F. This study applied a quasi-experimental method with a single group pretest-posttest design. The results show an increase in the average score from 63.75 on the pretest to 91.25 on the posttest. The hypothesis test produced a significance value of 0.000 (less than 0.05) with an N-Gain of 0.7667, which is classified as high. These findings prove that the generative learning model with cognitive conflict strategies is effective in improving students' science literacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, N., Akmam, A., Darvina, Y., & Afrizon, R. (2024). The Influence of a Generative Learning Model Based on Wave Material Cognitive Conflict on Student Learning Outcomes at Sman 5 Payakumbuh. Physics Learning and Education, 2(2), 81–88.

Agustina, M., Ariani, T., & Yolanda, Y. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Fisika Berbasis CTL Berbantuan Aplikasi Canva untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 14(2), 169–178.

Akmam, A., Ahzari, S., Emiliannur, E., & Anshari, R. (2025). Enhancing Science Literacy through Cognitive Conflict-Based Generative Learning Model : An Experimental Study in Physics Learning. Social Sciences and Humanities Journal, 09(07), 8507–8522.

Akmam, A. H. A. (2019). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Generatif Berbasis Strategi Konflik Kognitif Terhadap Kompetensi Mahasiswa Dalam Mata Kuliah Algoritma Dan Pemograman Komputer. Prosiding Semirata 2017 Bidang FMIPA, 11(1), 1–14.

Anggi, O. P., Hernani, & Solihat, R. (2019). Improving Student’s Scientific Literacy Skill Through POGIL with Socioscientific Issues Context on the Topic Enviromental Pollution. Proceedings of International Conference on Biology and Applied Science, 1(1), 17–22.

Devana, Mufit, F., Ratnawulan, & Yumna, H. (2025). Cognitive Conflict-Based Learning Materials Thermodynamics with Augmented Reality : Is It Practical in Physics Learning ? Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 3(1), 70–79.

Effendi, M. S., Asriniati, W., & Murti, S. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Generatif dalam Pembelajaran Menulis Teks Negosiasi pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri Raksa Budi. Jurnal Perspektif Pendidikan, 17(1), 161–172.

Fajri, B. L., & Wantika, R. R. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Driyorejo. Journal of Mathematics Education and Sicence, 5(1), 117–120.

Fitri, A., & Putra, A. (2023). Pengaruh Strategi Konflik Kognitif Model Discovery Based Learning Terhadap Pencapaian Kompetensi Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Kelas XI SMAN 2 Padang Panjang Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika , Universitas Negeri Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 22868–22877.

Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116.

Hasanah Parni, N., & Dwi Sundari, P. (2023). The Implementation of a Generative Learning Model With Contextual Approach Toward Physics Learning Outcomes. Physics Learning and Education, 1(3), 182–188.

Hendini, E., Akmam, A., Gusnedi, G., & Sundari, P. D. (2023). Implementation of Generative Learning Models with Probing Question Methods in Static Fluid Learning. Physics Learning and Education, 1(3), 166–172.

Kiranti, G. A. (2019). Profil Hambatan Belajar Epistimologis Siswa Pada Materi Fuida Statis Kelas XI SMA Berbasis Analisis Tes Kemampuan Responden. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 128–136.

Kurniawan, R. V. (2023). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Topik Fluida Statis. Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 67–73.

Moma, L. (2013). The Enhancement of Junior High School Students Mathematical Creative Thinking Abilities through Generative Learning. International Institute for Science, Tecnology and Educationducation, 3(8), 146–157.

Mufit, F., & Dhanil, M. (2024). Effectiveness of Augmented Reality with Cognitive Conflict Model to Improve Scientific Literacy of Static Fluid Material. International Journal of Information and Education Thecnology, 14(9), 1199–1207.

OECD. (2017). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing (Vol. 1, Issue 1).

Rahayu, S. (2019). Socioscientific Issues : Manfaatnya dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Socioscientific Issues : Manfaatnya dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Sains , Nature of Science ( NOS ) dan Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA UNESA.

Rahmatiah, R., H, S. K., & Kusairi, S. (2016). Pengaruh Scaffolding Konseptual dalam Pembelajaran Group Investigation Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika Siswa SMA dengan Pengetahuan Awal Berbeda. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, II(2), 45–54.

Rohmaya, N. (2022). Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Socioscientific Issues (SSI). Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 12(2), 107–117.

Setiawati, W. E., Jatmiko, B., Fisika, J., & Surabaya, U. N. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 07(02), 287–291.

Shofiyah, N., Jatmiko, B., Suprapto, N., Prahani, B. K., & Anggraeni, D. M. (2025). The use of technology to scientific reasoning in science education: A bibliometric and content analysis of research papers. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11(April), 1–13.

Sudirman, S. (2022). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Generatif Terhadap Keterampilan Generik Sains Fisika Peserta Didik Pada Materi Momentum Dan Impuls. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 119–126.

Suparya, I. K., I Wayan Suastra, & Putu Arnyana, I. B. (2022). Rendahnya Literasi Sains: Faktor Penyebab Dan Alternatif Solusinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 153–

Syahidi, K., Jufri, A. W., Doyan, A., Kosim, K., Rokhmat, J., & Sukarso, A. (2023). Penguatan Literasi Sains dan Pendidikan Karakter pada Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21. Kappa Journal Physics Adn Physics Education, 7(3), 538–542.

Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis Rendahnya Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Indonesia: Hasil Pisa Dan Faktor Penyebab. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–19.

Zainuddin; Riana, Dwi Astuti; Misbah, Misbah; Wati, Mustika; Dewantara, D. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Generatif Materi Fluida Statis Terintegrasi Ayat-ayat Al-Quran. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains, 9(1), 1–12.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Siti Rahma Fitri Yani, Akmam, A., Darvina, Y., & Novitra, F. (2025). The Effectiviness of The Generative Learning Model with Cognitive Conflict Strategy on Students’ Science Literacy in Fluid Material in Grade XI. Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 3(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol3-iss2/105
Received 2025-08-06
Accepted 2025-12-17
Published 2025-12-17