Design of STEM-based E-Student Worksheet Global Warming to Improve High School Students' Critical Thinking Skills

Sahri Ropiah Lubis; Selma Riyasni; Yurnetti Yurnetti; Fuja Novitra

doi:10.24036/jipt/vol3-iss2/111

Authors

Sahri Ropiah Lubis Universitas Negeri Padang
Selma Riyasni Department of Physics, Padang State University, Padang, Indonesia
Yurnetti Department of Physics, Padang State University, Padang, Indonesia
Fuja Novitra Department of Physics, Padang State University, Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol3-iss2/111

Keywords:

E-LKPD, STEM, Critical thinking, Global warming

Abstract

This research was motivated by the importance of critical thinking skills in understanding environmental issues such as global warming. Preliminary findings showed that the critical thinking skills of Grade X students at SMAN 3 Padang were still low, reaching only 29.67%. Learning also remained limited to the use of student worksheets that were not STEM-based and lacked optimal technology integration. This study aimed to develop a STEM-integrated E-student worksheet to support interactive learning and improve students’ critical thinking skills. The study used a Research and Development (R&D) method with the 4-D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate), limited to the Develop stage. The product was created using Liveworksheets and validated by experts, physics teachers, and students. The expert validation achieved an average score of 0.94 (valid), covering material substance (0.95), instructional design (0.96), visual communication (0.98), software use (0.87), STEM assessment (0.91), and critical thinking assessment (0.95). Practicality tests resulted in 95% from teachers and 92% from students, categorized as very practical. Thus, the STEM-based E-student worksheet is valid, practical, and potentially improves students’ critical thinking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings, educational and psychological measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142.

Asniar, Nurhayati, & Kaeruddin. (2022). Analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran pendidikan abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2, 140–151.

Asrizal, A., Mardian, V., Novitra, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Physics electronic teaching material-integrated STEM education to promote 21st-century skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(8), 2899–2914. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i8.7357

Bani, K. K. N., Falasifah, F., & Iskandar, S. (2025). Strategi pengembangan pembelajaran matematika pada abad XXI. JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan), 8(1), 3.

Bouchey, B., Castek, J., & Thygeson, J. (2021). Multimodal learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6_3

Deprisa, M., Zikra, & Afza, A. (2024). Pengembangan E-LKPD pada materi pemanasan global di kelas X SMA/MA. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 179–187.

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1). Insight Assessment. https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts

Fithri, S., Pada, A. U. T., Artika, W., Nurmaliah, C., & Hasanuddin, H. (2021). Implementasi LKPD berbasis STEM untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i4.20816

Fitriani, H., Sudiatmika, A. R., Suma, I. K., & Ganesha, I. N. (2023). Kajian meta-analisis: Efektivitas penggunaan bahan ajar terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis berdasarkan jenjang pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(2), 1848–1861.

Fitriyah, L., & Madlazim, M. (2021). Pengembangan LKPD pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terintegrasi STEM menggunakan PhET simulation untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v10n1.p99-108

Furqoniyah, Q., Subiki, S., & Maryani, M. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) dalam pembelajaran fisika pemanasan global di SMA. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v9i1.15539

Harefa, R. A. (2019). Peran ilmu fisika dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Jurnal Warta, April, 1–10.

Hasanah, D., & Budhi, W. (2023). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik elektronik (E-LKPD) fisika berbasis STEM pada topik elastisitas dan hukum Hooke. Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.30738/cjipf.v9i2.15000

Kemendiknas. (2010). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis TIK. Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen, Jakarta.

Khairiyah, U., Gusmaniarti, G., Asmara, B., Suryanti, S., Wiryanto, W., & Sulistiyono, S. (2023). Fenomena penerapan kurikulum merdeka dalam pembentukan karakter profil pelajar Pancasila siswa sekolah dasar. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.30651/else.v7i2.16924

Lawhon, D. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2

Lestari, I. F., & Muhajir, S. N. (2021). Pendekatan STEM untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi fluida statis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 1(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v1i2.1483

Mabsutsah, N., & Yushardi. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan guru terhadap e-module berbasis STEAM dan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(6), 205–213.

Magdalena, I., Sundari, T., Nurkamilah, S., & Amalia, D. A. (n.d.). Analisis bahan ajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2, 311–326.

Mulyani, F., & Haliza, N. (2021). Analisis perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi (IPTEK) dalam pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 3(1), 101–109.

Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif.

Putriyana, A. W., Auliandari, L., & Kholillah, K. (2020). Kelayakan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis model pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share pada praktikum materi fungi. Biodik, 6(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i2.9255

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian (Panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). Parama Publishing.

Rizky Satria, P. A., Sekar, W. K., & Harjatanaya, T. Y. (2022). Panduan pengembangan P5: Projek penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 138).

Salsabilla, A., Kaniawati, I., & Liliawati, W. (2024). Development of e-LKPD based on STEM to enhance students’ critical thinking skills on topic of renewable energy. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 10(1), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i1.7016

Sinaga, P., Setiawan, W., & Liana, M. (2022). The impact of electronic interactive teaching materials (EITMs) in e-learning on junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101066

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif (Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, interpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif). http://belajarpsikologi.com/metode-penelitian-kualitatif/

Tunas, K. O., & Pangkey, R. D. H. (2024). Kurikulum Merdeka: Meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dengan kebebasan dan fleksibilitas. Journal on Education, 6(4), 22031–22040.

Yulanda, V., Hamidah, A., & Anggereini, E. (2023). Development of electronic student worksheets (E-LKPD) based on problem-based learning as an effort to improve critical thinking of grade VIII middle school students on respiratory system material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7326–7332. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4144

Zahara, M., Abdurrahman, A., Herlina, K., Widyanti, R., & Agustiana, L. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of 3D technology-integrated student worksheet on magnetic field material: A preliminary research on augmented reality in STEM learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012083